So why am I
writing about this on YATopia? Good question! Well, while transferring files
from an old computer to a new one, I stumbled across my 2014 nanowrimo project,
a NA Dystopian. I started reading it and for once when I read an early version
of my own work, I didn’t think it totally sucked. It needs work, for sure!
Actually, it needs a total overhaul as I intend to change some major things and
turn it into a sci-fi rather than a dystopian.
One of the
things that I noticed was that, once again, I had added steam to it. Typical of
me, but I also thought I knew when a steamy scene needed to be in a book and
when it didn’t. For my PNR, I included them when emotions were running high and
when there was an actual point to having them there. They belonged. But this
nanowrimo project that I found, the sex is without a doubt out of place. Even
reading it, I can see myself that this book is a YA pretending to be NA. The
language is definitely geared toward older young adults, as are the small but
technical descriptions when it comes to the science behind their existence. The
sex just doesn’t need to be there—there is no place for it. Certainly the
emotional relationship the two share can be explored, but I don’t need to
include a detailed physical scene to do this.
The debate
on whether to include sex in YA books has been going for a while now. I support
the inclusion. Indeed, it has to approached with care, and it definitely can’t
be graphic, but for me this didn’t matter. The sex simply didn’t belong. And
that’s really what this post is about—knowing when to include it and when not
to. To me, the answer is really quite simple. If they belong there, if they
truly move your plot forward then that’s a-okay, but if there is no other
reason for them being there other than ‘they just are’, then maybe that
particular sex scene needs some rethinking.
To be honest, I’m not sure I’ll ever publish this book, but
I do intend to work on it, so part of that includes deciding whether there is a
place for sex in this book, and there isn’t.
E.L. Wicker
E.L. Wicker
No comments:
Post a Comment