The last few months I’ve been talking about critique partners,
who, to me, are a non-negotiable must-have for anyone serious about writing.
In January I talked about where to find critique partners and in February I
covered what kinds of critique partners you might want to have in your stable.
This month, I’m going to focus on how to give good critique (stay tuned for
next month when I discuss what NOT to do in a critique).
Most of us would not invest our time and energy into reading purely
for the sport of tearing down a fellow writer. But we could all probably stand
a reminder on how to deliver tough news in sensitive ways. Yes, your CP is
looking to you to help her identify problem areas in her manuscript.
Basically, she is asking you to find fault. Which makes you a bit damned. Most
writers describe the first draft as falling in love. We love our words, our
concept, our characters. We have fallen asleep plotting their actions and woken
up thinking of their worlds. When your critique of that beloved manuscript lands
in a writer’s inbox, it’s akin to that writer discovering her dream date lives
with his mother. Probably not a deal-breaker, but the bloom is off the rose.
And you’re the one who plucked the petals.
There’s no way around that, but there are ways to deliver a
thoughtful critique that will likely include some bad with the good. First of
all, remember the compliment sandwich. Your CP doesn’t want you blowing smoke up
his butt, but he would probably greatly appreciate if your notes started out
with some things that are working
well in the manuscript. This lets the writer know that the problems you’ll be
mentioning next may exist, but overall the work has merit and potential. It’s
also always nice to end with a brief note thanking the writer for sharing his
words with you and reiterating your confidence in his ability to make the story
even better!
Frame your critique constructively. Make comments designed not to
tear down, but to build up the work. Phrases like “Have you considered…”, “It
might be interesting to see what would happen if…”, and “I think you could
solve this by…” are all helpful and kind ways to point out issues.
Admit your own subjectivity. Every reader brings his or her personal
tastes and experiences to a story and sometimes it’s as simple as saying, “This
could just be me, but…” For instance: if your best friend in high school had an
eating disorder, which also happens to be the topic of the manuscript you’re
critiquing, that is helpful for the writer to know because you may be both more
attuned to the realities of the disorder and whether the author captured them
realistically and also more sensitive to some of the content explored. When CPs prefaces a comment by saying
something like, “I’ll admit I’m kind of an overprotective mom, but this scene
made me cringe because…” that’s actually helpful. By quantifying, you’re
raising a flag that lets the writer know she should get some further feedback
on this concern before making any decisions on a change.
Ask questions. “Would she be wearing that tank top if your
manuscript is set in January?”, “If one of his hands is in her hair and another
at her back, how is he texting his friend right now?” “Would she really do
this/say this/think this here?” are all far better ways to point something out
that “Uh, hello, it’s WINTER”, “Is he a three-armed freak or something?”, “The
voice is wayyyy off here”. Often we’re so ensconced in the story that we dash
off a quick note so we can get back to reading, and don’t take the time to
think about how that note could be interpreted. If that’s something you do, take
a quick scroll through your comments before sending back to the writer.
Remember to point out the good. It is every bit as useful for a
writer to know what scenes, sentences, and word choices are working as it is to
know the ones that aren’t. My CPs and I have all adopted the method of one, who
uses a green highlighter to quickly mark sentences or scenes she loves to
death. I get so happy when I encounter green in my manuscript, even if it’s in
the middle of lots of comment boxes of issues that need addressing. I’ve found
personal or funny notes can have the same effect. A quick “Oh man, that’s so
embarrassing for the MC. Reminds me of the time I spilled milk on the Pope” or
“Great, now I’m crying!” or “I wanted to go to sleep at the end of this chapter
but, curse you, because now I have to know what happens!” is a welcome break
from more critical notes and reminds the writer that you do indeed like her story!
How about you? What do you love to see in critiques you’ve gotten back? How do you
frame your own comments to others?
Wow Jennifer, I want to have all my future CPs sign an affidavit saying they have read and understood this blog post before proceeding to read my manuscript. I don't think that's unreasonable AT ALL. ;) Seriously, great advice. Luckily, I'm blessed with an awesome critique partner (@ifeomadennis) who does all this and more, which is a good reminder that I need to cling on to her for dear life, and I need to be that kind of CP for her and others when my turn comes around.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jen! Great post - I'm going to share it with my critique partners!
ReplyDelete